Minutes Records
MEETING 1
Date of Meeting: 2014-01-14
Duration Time: 8:00 PM – 10:00 PM
List of Attendees: Andy, David, Phattrick, Kenneth, Matthew, Jon
Meeting Location/Communication Medium Used: Google Hangout, Google Doc, Google Calendar
Issues Discussed: Team Member Role Assignment, Project Topic Preference Order
ISSUE 1 - Roles Documentation:
Project manager/team leader - David
Risks Manager - David
Communication and Contact Manager - Jon
Configuration Manager - Matt
Progress Manager - Andy
Web Master - Andy
Minutes Manager - Andy
Research and Training Manager - Phattrick
Software Version Control Manager – Kenneth
Documented roles were assigned and agreed to early during the day when group met and
discussed. It was noted that group had misunderstood the responsibilities of the
Configuration Manager. Matthew has confirmed agreement to taking the role once
responsibilities were clarified.
ISSUE 2 – Project Topic Preference Order:
Group members discussed the pros and cons for each project topic and listed the pros of
each topic on the Administration Google Documentation file created by David. Here is a
summary of discussed results:
Project Topic Preference Order:
FIRST CHOICE: 4B - City of Vancouver: Explore Your City application
*If 4B is not chosen, we will take 4A as top choice
Justification:
- Client is well-known.
- Our team have developers of various skill levels in terms of web development.
- Similar workflow to CPSC 310
- Some of us have used the OpenData from Vancouver before.
- Detailed requirements, follows the standard web application format.
SECOND CHOICE: UBC CBEL
Justification:
- good for resume
- web application
- UBC Students giving back to the university!
- Well documented requirements
- Excellent way to gain web development and database experience.
- Our team members’ various technical backgrounds caters to all aspects of this project.
- We have team members who have worked with security, front-end, database, etc.
THIRD CHOICE: Pitch’n
- web application
- Startup
FOURTH CHOICE: BETH Multiplatform Logic solver and verifier
Justification:
- Used by the university
- Cross-platform (Windows, Mac)
- Most team members have no knowledge about semantic tableau and prolog.
- As a team we’re looking to gain experience in industry-relevant technology/language.
Our meeting concluded with an email to Kurt regarding role assignment and project topic
selection.Team member's timetables were shared via Google Calendar to schedule future
project related activities.